When his father fell unwell whereas visiting Canada, son confronted virtually $19,000 in medical payments with no tax reduction
Opinions and proposals are unbiased and merchandise are independently chosen. Postmedia might earn an affiliate fee from purchases made via hyperlinks on this web page.
Article content material
One of many extra well-liked tax credit, claimed by greater than 5 million Canadians yearly, is the medical expense tax credit score (METC), which supplies tax reduction for qualifying above-average medical or disability-related bills incurred by people on behalf of themselves, a partner or common-law accomplice, or a dependent relative.
Underneath the Earnings Tax Act, you’ll be able to declare a METC for bills you paid for your self, your partner or accomplice, and your youngsters below age 18. The worth of this federal credit score is calculated by making use of the bottom private earnings tax charge (15 per cent) to the quantity of qualifying medical bills in extra of the lesser of three per cent of your web earnings or $2,759 (in 2024). The credit score could be claimed for bills paid in any interval of 12 consecutive months that ends within the taxation yr during which the declare is being made. There are additionally parallel provincial and territorial medical expense credit accessible at varied charges and minimal spend thresholds.
Commercial 2
Article content material
Article content material
For medical bills paid on behalf of dependent kinfolk aside from minor kids, you’re in a position to declare qualifying medical bills that exceed the lesser of three per cent of the dependant’s web earnings or $2,759. For functions of the METC, eligible dependants embody grownup (grand)kids, (grand)mother and father, brothers, sisters, uncles, aunts, nephews and nieces supplied they had been depending on you for help and had been residents of Canada at any time within the yr.
A tax case determined final month handled the METC associated to medical bills paid by a taxpayer for his father. In Might 2019, the taxpayer’s father was on a customer’s visa to Canada and deliberate to remain for about two weeks. Sadly, his father suffered a significant coronary heart assault and remained in hospital in Canada for eight weeks till July 2019.
Throughout his hospital keep, he required acute after which rehabilitative medical care, which was not coated below the provincial well being care system as a result of his father wasn’t a resident of Canada. Sadly, he handed away in November 2021.
“Lest anybody suppose healthcare is ‘free’ in Canada,” the choose famous, the daddy’s health-care prices amounted to greater than $18,700, which the taxpayer, as a “dutiful and caring son,” paid. The taxpayer proceeded to say these bills on his 2019 tax return as certified medical bills for a dependant — his father. The Canada Income Company subsequently denied his declare, and the taxpayer objected and took the matter to Tax Courtroom.
Prime Tales
Article content material
Commercial 3
Article content material
The choose clearly articulated the legislation for claiming medical bills for a dependant, breaking it down into its three elements. To have the ability to declare the METC for a dependant, the recipient of the medical expense should be associated not directly to the taxpayer. Second, the recipient should be depending on the taxpayer for help. Lastly, if the dependant isn’t a partner or common-law accomplice or (grand)little one of the taxpayer, they should be a relative who’s “resident in Canada at any time within the yr.”
The primary situation was clearly glad because the taxpayer paid the medical bills of his father, a qualifying relative. So far as dependency, the courtroom discovered that through the father’s presence in Canada, he was “factually totally dependent” upon his son. The quantities paid to help his father’s remedy, lodging and rehabilitation as a way to permit him to depart the hospital, and, finally, Canada, had been all paid for by the taxpayer. Thus, the one contentious subject within the case was the residency take a look at, particularly, the that means of the phrase “resident in Canada at any time within the yr.”
Commercial 4
Article content material
The taxpayer interpreted this phrase to imply “an individual that’s legally residing in Canada any time between Jan. 1 and Dec. 31 in a particular yr.” Since his father was issued a authorized visa for as much as six months and he visited for about eight weeks, together with his time within the hospital, the taxpayer argued that this could represent residence in Canada. In consequence, his father was a resident of Canada on the time of his eight-week keep, when the medical bills had been incurred.
The CRA disagreed, noting that the Earnings Tax Act, when it refers to residency in Canada as the idea for taxation, makes use of the frequent legislation definition of residency, which embodies the idea of “ordinarily resident in Canada.”
The choose famous that the time period “resident in Canada at any time within the yr” is discovered 17 occasions within the act, and, maybe most significantly, is present in the primary charging provision of the act during which residency varieties the idea for taxation in Canada. In his view, to be “resident in Canada” for the aim of claiming the METC for a dependant, “the conventional guidelines of residency ought to be used that are in any other case relevant to different sections of the (act) to yield constant software.”
Commercial 5
Article content material
In different phrases, the case comes down as to if the daddy might be thought-about a “factual resident of Canada” at any time in 2019. For the reason that function of the daddy’s journey was to go to his son and different members of the family in Canada for a finite period of time, and, however for his coronary heart assault, he would have returned dwelling (his extraordinary place of residence) after two weeks, there was merely no proof to ascertain that the daddy was planning to remain in Canada.
Really helpful from Editorial
Because the choose wrote, the daddy “by no means transformed or ever supposed to transform his intentions, habits or domicile to Canada past a brief go to, unavoidably delayed for an extra six weeks due to his coronary heart assault. He was not a factual resident.”
In consequence, the choose denied the taxpayer’s declare for the METC on the idea that his father, for whom he claimed the medical bills, was not an extraordinary resident of Canada.
Jamie Golombek, FCPA, FCA, CFP, CLU, TEP, is the managing director, Tax & Property Planning with CIBC Non-public Wealth in Toronto. Jamie.Golombek@cibc.com.
In case you appreciated this story, join extra within the FP Investor e-newsletter.
Bookmark our web site and help our journalism: Don’t miss the enterprise information you want to know — add financialpost.com to your bookmarks and join our newsletters right here.
Article content material
