Jamie Golombek: Taxpayer on the hook for tremendous for improperly transferring contributions from one financial institution to a different
Opinions and suggestions are unbiased and merchandise are independently chosen. Postmedia might earn an affiliate fee from purchases made by means of hyperlinks on this web page.
Article content material
I obtained my 2023 Discover of Evaluation this week and it contained the complete particulars of my tax evaluation, a proof of modifications and different essential info, together with a one-page detailed registered retirement financial savings plan (RRSP) deduction restrict and accessible contribution room assertion. What it didn’t comprise, nonetheless, was an identical assertion about my accessible tax-free financial savings account (TFSA) contribution room.
Commercial 2
Article content material
For this, that you must go browsing to the Canada Income Company’s portal, My Account or cellphone the tax info cellphone service (TIPS) at 1-800-267-6999. Assuming you may have the persistence to carry (wait occasions this week have been 1.5 to 2 hours), you’ll be able to ask an agent for a TFSA Room Assertion and a TFSA Transaction Abstract, which present the knowledge the CRA has obtained out of your TFSA issuers about your contributions and withdrawals.
Article content material
Every year, all TFSA issuers are required to electronically submit a TFSA report to the CRA for every particular person who has a TFSA. Issuers should submit this info by the final day of February of the next yr, and report all TFSA transactions you made on or earlier than Dec. 31 of the prior yr.
It’s essential, nonetheless, to check the TFSA transaction info the CRA has with your individual information to make sure the knowledge they’ve is right and updated. It’s attainable that if you look on-line, particularly within the first few months of the yr, the CRA might not but have obtained and processed the earlier yr’s transactions, that means they’re not but mirrored within the TFSA quantities proven on-line. This might result in an overcontribution.
Prime Tales
Article content material
Commercial 3
Article content material
The penalty for overcontributing is the same as one per cent per thirty days for every month you’re over your restrict. When you get assessed a TFSA penalty tax, you’ll be able to request the CRA to waive or cancel it, which the company has the ability to do if it may be established the tax arose “as a consequence of an affordable error,” and the overcontribution is withdrawn from the TFSA “directly.”
If the CRA refuses to cancel the tax, you’ll be able to take the matter to Federal Courtroom, the place a decide will decide whether or not the CRA’s resolution to not waive the tax was “affordable.”
The latest resolution involving a TFSA overcontribution, determined in April 2024, involved a taxpayer who went about transferring his TFSA from one monetary establishment to a different within the mistaken method.
The taxpayer had at the very least two TFSA accounts. Originally of 2020, his unused TFSA room was $6,270. He contributed a complete of $46,000 in 2020, and so he exceeded his restrict by $39,730 and was consequently assessed a penalty tax.
The supply of his overcontributions could possibly be traced again to the taxpayer’s actions in early 2020. On Feb. 4, 2020, he withdrew $20,000 from his Fédération des caisses Desjardins du Québec TFSA account, and deposited it the following day into his Nationwide Financial institution TFSA account.
Commercial 4
Article content material
He did the identical factor once more the next month, when on March 9, 2020, he withdrew one other $20,000 from his Desjardins TFSA account, solely to deposit it the following day into his Nationwide Financial institution of Canada TFSA. He had additionally deposited one other $6,000 into his TFSA account in early 2020, so his complete 2020 TFSA contributions have been $46,000, however he solely had $6,270 in unused room.
In July 2021, the taxpayer obtained a discover from the CRA advising him that he had exceeded his TFSA contribution restrict in 2020, and telling him he needed to pay $2,166 in penalty tax on his extra contributions for 2020.
In October 2021, the taxpayer despatched a letter to the CRA requesting that it cancel the tax on his extra TFSA contributions. In March 2022, the CRA wrote to him denying his request, saying it may solely achieve this if the contributions have been made because of a “affordable error,” and the person instantly took steps to withdraw them from the TFSA, which was not the case right here.
Following this refusal, the taxpayer filed a second software in April 2022 for the cancellation of the tax. In June 2022, the CRA once more denied his request “as a result of the transfers of funds made in 2020 from one TFSA account to a different TFSA account weren’t ‘direct transfers’ for the reason that transfers weren’t made by the monetary establishment.” The end result was that these transfers have been thought-about to be common contributions, placing the taxpayer in an overcontribution state of affairs.
Commercial 5
Article content material
The taxpayer appealed this resolution to the Federal Courtroom. He argued that “he (had) acted in good religion in transferring funds from one TFSA account to a different.” However the CRA maintained that the taxpayer’s error on this case was not a “affordable error” as a result of he admitted he had not made his transfers within the method prescribed by the CRA (by asking his monetary establishment to take action straight) since he was unaware of the duty to take action. Within the CRA’s view, its train of discretion to waive the penalty tax wouldn’t be applicable within the circumstances.
The decide reviewed the arguments after which cited numerous prior circumstances coping with comparable eventualities during which it was held that it was as much as the taxpayer to know the TFSA guidelines, together with methods to property switch funds “straight” from one TFSA to a different.
It could possibly’t merely be completed through a withdrawal and subsequent deposit, however have to be completed straight by the monetary establishment. In a majority of these circumstances, the courts have constantly held that the CRA’s refusal to deal with such errors as “affordable errors” (which might permit the CRA to waive the tax), was, itself, affordable.
Commercial 6
Article content material
The decide finally expressed sympathy for the taxpayer, however stated he was “certain by the jurisprudence and ideas recognized by my colleagues. My position is to not rule on the deserves, however to evaluate whether or not the (CRA’s) resolution is cheap, figuring out whether or not it’s intelligible, clear and justified.” The decide concluded that it was, and dismissed the taxpayer’s case.
Really helpful from Editorial
Whereas the CRA sought prices, the decide refused to award the company something owing to the unlucky circumstances of the case.
Jamie Golombek, FCPA, FCA, CFP, CLU, TEP, is the managing director, Tax & Property Planning with CIBC Non-public Wealth in Toronto. Jamie.Golombek@cibc.com.
When you favored this story, join extra within the FP Investor e-newsletter.
Bookmark our web site and help our journalism: Don’t miss the enterprise information that you must know — add financialpost.com to your bookmarks and join our newsletters right here.
Article content material
